Kenneth Foster Jr. - Felony Murder (law of parties)
Never shot anyone
|
A person should be charged, tried and convicted of a crime that they actually committed. Being a driver is not be committing a murder. Being at the scene does not a murderer make. The felony murder doctrine, in some states called the law of parties or merger doctrine, seeks to hold anyone and everyone accountable for the actions of one. We say, again, that you are not your brothers keeper. Kenneth never shot anyone, but was hours away from being executed by the state of Texas. What faith can we have in a justice system that charges and convicts for a crime not committed in the name of law under a flawed statute?
|
Summary
On August 15, 1996, Kenneth Foster Jr. and three friends were arrested shortly after the shooting of Michael Lahood Jr., the son of a prominent attorney in Bexar county. Mauriceo Brown, the admitted triggerman, exited the car that Kenneth drove, and entered into an exchange with the victim that resulted in a shot that claimed Lahood Jr.’s life. Because of two robberies that the group conducted hours earlier (Kenneth being the driver for both), it was easy for jurors to infer that the situation in Lahood’s driveway was a botched robbery, though there is evidence to suggest otherwise.
Regardless, for being the evening’s driver, Kenneth would pay dearly. Under the Texas legal principle called the Law of Parties, even though Kenneth was factually innocent of the killing (he never left the car or touched the gun) he was regarded just as guilty as the shooter. According to the Law of Parties, if one conspires to commit one felony (eg. robbery) and another felony (murder) is committed, the conspirator is just as guilty because he should have “anticipated” it.
It didn’t matter that Brown admitted to shooting LaHood on an independent impulse. According to members of the jury, Kenneth should have known that a murder could have taken place. In a zealous prosecution, Kenneth was tried jointly with Brown for capital murder, convicted, and sentenced to death. At age 20, Foster began his ten year journey at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Death Row. His daughter Nydesha was fifteen months old.
If you would like to get a deeper insight ino the case, here you can find the extensive version :
http://www.freekenneth.com/case-extensive-version/
Regardless, for being the evening’s driver, Kenneth would pay dearly. Under the Texas legal principle called the Law of Parties, even though Kenneth was factually innocent of the killing (he never left the car or touched the gun) he was regarded just as guilty as the shooter. According to the Law of Parties, if one conspires to commit one felony (eg. robbery) and another felony (murder) is committed, the conspirator is just as guilty because he should have “anticipated” it.
It didn’t matter that Brown admitted to shooting LaHood on an independent impulse. According to members of the jury, Kenneth should have known that a murder could have taken place. In a zealous prosecution, Kenneth was tried jointly with Brown for capital murder, convicted, and sentenced to death. At age 20, Foster began his ten year journey at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Death Row. His daughter Nydesha was fifteen months old.
If you would like to get a deeper insight ino the case, here you can find the extensive version :
http://www.freekenneth.com/case-extensive-version/
KXAN Interview of Kenneth Foster
Please take a moment to visit Kenneth's site, read the details of his case. Sentenced to death in one form or another for not killing someone is not justice. Kenneth's imminent death by execution may have been stayed but it was traded for the slower form of the same. Death by incarceration.
http://www.freekenneth.com/case-extensive-version/
Disclaimer: This website expresses opinions and shares information about cases that have been provided to Just Us. In some cases we simply share the links and repeat information contained in other sites. The comments of visitors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect the opinions of Just Us. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. This website does not provide legal advice. We do not give legal advice. We do not practice law. Anyone with legal questions need to consult an attorney. Please read the Terms of Use policy.